50 Book Challenge
Mar. 10th, 2003 09:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just bailed on the 50 book challenge community. Too much traffic, too many people whom I didn't know (and thus whose recommendations and reviews weren't as weighty for me).
Great idea in general, but got too out of hand for me.
It'd be greatly improved if people would confine themselves to doing a once-per-month update.
Great idea in general, but got too out of hand for me.
It'd be greatly improved if people would confine themselves to doing a once-per-month update.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:04 am (UTC)True.
Date: 2003-03-10 07:12 am (UTC)Re: True.
Date: 2003-03-10 07:14 am (UTC)Re: True.
Date: 2003-03-10 07:19 am (UTC)Re: True.
Date: 2003-03-10 07:34 am (UTC)YES!
Date: 2003-03-10 07:24 am (UTC)Re: YES!
Date: 2003-03-10 07:32 am (UTC)Understandable....
Date: 2003-03-10 07:31 am (UTC)Maybe weekly postings -- monthly seems much too long to wait - then there'd be a HUGE bunch of posts at the beginning/end of the month!
As to the books other people choose to read - meh. I lean a lot towards science fiction & fantasy & I'm sure there are those who would trash me for that. If I'm supposed to be impressing you with what I'm reading, I guess I'm in the wrong place.
Re: Understandable....
Date: 2003-03-10 07:39 am (UTC)I confess, I've found some interesting people who reported reading books I loved (so I thought, cool, kindred spirit!) and there have been a few times when people have posted about books I wondered about reading. That's been helpful, and interesting. But I'm finding I'm skimming more and more, and my chances of catching those gems declines as I do so.
Your job is to post in your journal about any super-cool entries to the 50 book challenge community. You must accept this mission.
u
Re: Understandable....
Date: 2003-03-10 07:45 am (UTC)Did you see my post on Geek Love before you left?
Any specific genres/categories/posters etc. to look for?
DRAT - meant to mention I'd be interested in a Doper book group - tho I'm not always good at reading the same book everyone else is...
Re: Understandable....
Date: 2003-03-10 07:49 am (UTC)heyyyy....
Date: 2003-03-10 08:02 am (UTC)And yeah, sometimes I think I read other entries and get all-eye rolly, and then I think, Who the Hell Do I Think I Am? and I don't like that about myself. So I need to find some other resource.
And Geek Love is an amazing, disturbing book...I hoped you thought it was interesting!
Re: heyyyy....
Date: 2003-03-10 10:08 am (UTC)As I said in my comments about Geek Love, "It was a grotesquely entertaining read." And not something I probably would have picked up on my own if I hadn't read someone else's review.
No, I just got Joe Defensive.
Re: No pants, hmmmm?
Date: 2003-03-10 01:52 pm (UTC)No pants, hmmmm?
Date: 2003-03-10 12:32 pm (UTC)Oh darn - you're a girl.
In that case - I'd suggest you get dressed, young lady! Catch your death of cold!
I've been known to don an Attitude Dress at times myself - I imagine it as black leather with lots of studs & buckles :^)
Psst - mind if I befriend you?
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:51 am (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/074341313X/qid=1047311387/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-5245631-9400902?v=glance&s=books
i here it has ekselent reviews.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 07:53 am (UTC)Oh well. My reading for the next couple months is pretty much being dictated to me (I have to review them) so my discretionary reading time is pretty much nil anyway.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 08:22 am (UTC)That said, I have found a few new kindred spirits, so I'm going to stick with it for now at least.
It's interesting that this community DID start out as a SDMB community, and other people just found it and joined. I don't think anyone advertised it or anything. A victim of its own success, maybe?
no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-10 10:23 am (UTC)no subject